Assisted writing tools aren't anything new. From simple autocorrect to todays full blown "ghost writers" these tools have helped both professional and casual writers to produce better text for years. With the advances in recent times it has become more unclear what is "real" writing and what is just a product of an algorithm.
At the extremes it's quite clear. Without using any tools to correct or suggest edits to a text is definitely a genuine human written text. On average it might not be the most elegant and informative text, but you can be sure it has been written by a human being. At the other extreme is the machine produced text. Nowadays hard to distinguish from good human written text. Or maybe it's easy to recognise as it might be better than average.
But what is still considered a creative product of a human being. Is it enough to give a topic to the AI and let it write the whole thing, or should there be manual edits and iterations to the text to make it more "real". What about if the text is still written entirely by the machine, but human spends time and effort creating a perfect prompt to produce exactly the kind of text they wanted in the first place.